Talk:Evolution religiosity
This is a good page. However, I think we need to look at the philosophical basis for evolution--i.e. Metaphysical naturalism--as the real religion here. Evolution is therefore a religious dogma because it is part of the religion of methodological Naturalism. Philosophers already consider metaphysical naturalism to be at least "quasi-religious". take a look at the metaphysical naturalism page and see how we can incorporate the religious aspects on both pages. Allenroyboy 16:17, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
I should be able to write in a brief discribtion, and then leave a link. Or you can since you know more about the subject. And link can be left to both pages in the see also sectons. [http://creationwiki.org/User_talk:Ikester7579 Talk] 13:20, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Format
A couple things are needed on this page.
1. An introduction/abstract at the beginning which summarizes the whole article. This comes before the first topic and does not have a section name.
2. This article lacks references. There are only two at the end and they are not formatted correctly. There should be at least one reference for each section or paragraph. This isn't supposed to be the opinion of an editor/s. To be effective against evolutionist, references are vital. I know this is a work in progress, but keeping it referenced as you go is easier than hunting for some after the fact. Allenroyboy 14:05, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
On further inspection I see that there are links to various sources outside of creation wiki. However, the format needs to be standardized. check out the Creation wiki policies or study other pages.... Allenroyboy 14:09, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Still building it
Well I don't do pages often all the time and I forget how to do stuff if I have not done it in a while. And I threw this page together from memory (from the top of my head). And had most of it together in just a week or 2. The way I usually build a page is put down the ideas I have while they are still fresh in my mind. Then I come back and do touch ups, add links, format, etc... But if I don't put down my ideas of how the page comes together first, I lose the memory of how it should come together. And it does not come out as good as it would have. But it will look better as time permits, and ideas about formatting come to mind as I go back through. Also, one note. References to examples of what evolutinists do are good but have one problem. Evolutionists usually cannot own up to their action, or what their actions cause. So where ever I leave a link as an example. 50% of the time they will move the page, change the page, or block linking from this site to their's. Which is fine when I catch them doing this because I point it out, and also the reason they did it.
So even though I will leave references, about half will have a problem in just a matter of weeks. Most I can fix by looking up other examples and using them. But some only have one place that has such a reference. So we will have to wait and see what happens as page comes together. [http://creationwiki.org/User_talk:Ikester7579 Talk] 11:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
