The Creation Wiki is now operating on a new and improved server.
From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Non falsifiable? Could someone please go do a research before posting this ridiculous claims? Please watch this if you have the time "Why evolution is True" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1m4mATYoig From Jerry Coyne, or read the new richard dawkins book, the evidence for evolution
Here are a list that it is presented on the video which could falsify evolution.
-Fossils in the wrong place (e.g. mammals on the devonian)
-General lack of variation in species
-Adaptation in one species only good for a second species
-"Adaptations" inimical for individuals but good for population/species
-Evolved altruistic behavior among non-relatives in non-social animals
-Discordance between Phylogenies based on morphology/fossils and on DNA
Yet none of this things have ever been found, yet there is bad design which creationism cant explain and by occams razor should be eliminated because evolution already explains why there is bad design, and creationism you have to have a whole lot of assumptions.
Peace and knowledge Ryosuke1208 07:38, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Creaionism predicts bad design due to the fall. --Tony 19:45, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Yeah i already know that someone will say that, but the fall doesnt explain anything, i could be saying, oh the bad design is because the flying spaghetti monster in hus drunkiness was responsible for all the bad designs.
But the fall "theory" doesnt make any predictions, hypothesis, or what should we expect, and what should be not expect from the fall "theory" thats why this falls short and gets cut of by occams razor. Peace Ryosuke1208 09:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Negative mutational load for species, or bad design. What does evolution have to say about bad design that is different? --Tony 04:26, 3 December 2009 (UTC)