Talk:Biblical canon

Hello All, I have been looking through the "Biblical canon" article and was wondering how people might feel about some fairly extensive revisions to it? The revisions would include everything from editing certain statements to make them more accurate to removal of some portions that are not as well founded in the scholarly material nor as "on topic" as they could be (for example, while the info on some of the historical versions of the Bible are interesting, they do not have much bearing upon the process of Canonization). This suggestion of, essentially, completely revising the "Biblical canon" article is not meant to denigrate anyone's efforts--I can see that a lot of time went into it--but I would really like to see this article be the best that it can be. perhaps there is a way that I could create a "practice article" that people can review before it replaces the current article? Please let me know what your thoughts on the matter are. BibleCanon (talk) 22:20, 14 December 2015 (EST)