Talk:Arguments creationists should not use
From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
 Post comment,or browse for more talk. |
I think the general public already knows that Geocentricity isn't a general creationist position. We have the pro-geocentricity + Geocentricity pages for that. Also, did you have to put it in the "arguments we think creationists should definately not use" section? Unless you can completely show it to be false. Also, I'm sure there are some other creationists on the creationwiki who would disagree with you putting that in that category.
--RichardT 23:35, 9 February 2007 (EST)
- Basking sharks are an evolutionist excuse for the unexplainable. Also the moon dust deal is a cover up. Example: As the earth travels through space around the sun, and the moon orbits the earth. They both travel through a lot of dust particles. Not only that, but the sun, earth, and moon attract dust because of gravity. Something the tests NASA did could not calculate into their results. Also, the sun produces solar wind which is plasma praticles which would constantly collect on the moons surface like dust particles. But yet not much of that is there either.[http://creationwiki.org/User_talk:Ikester7579 Talk] 07:50, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
