Fallacy of division

From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Jump to navigationJump to search
X mark.png

The fallacy of division, also know as false division arises when the inference of an argument depends on the erroneous transference of an attribute of the whole to the parts.[1] This is the exact reverse of the fallacy of composition.[2]

Examples

  • "His church is about half the size of most churches in the city, therefore, the pastor of this church should be about 3 feet tall"
  • Christian churches do not teach science, therefore creationists are uneducated about science.

Formal example

Formally speaking this fallacy has the following structure:

  • p is part of w
  • w has property t
  • therefore, p has property t

See Also

X mark.png
Warning:
This argument represents a
Fallacy of division.
Use the {{fallacy|Fallacy of division}} template to insert the above warning on a page containing an example of the Fallacy of division fallacy. The template links the warning label to this page.

References

  1. Hurley, Patrick J (2008). A Concise Introduction to Logic (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth. p. 161. ISBN 978-0-495-50383-5. 
  2. Bennett, Bo (2012). Logically...Fallacious:The Ultimate Collection of Over 300 Logical Fallacies. Sudbury, MA: eBookIt.com. p. 112-113. ISBN 978-1-4566-0752-4.