Worldview
From CreationWiki, the encyclopedia of creation science
Worldview may be defined as an outlook on life, or a view of the world derived from a philosophical axiom or presupposion. There are two basic worldviews, each with its own underlying assumptions. One system of thought has natural processes alone as its basis, the other, creation by God. These worldviews are becoming increasingly polarized due to the increased emphasis on teaching evolution in public schools with the exclusion of any opposing viewpoint. Also contributing is the generally one-sided approach taken by the popular media, which marginalizes other viewpoints.
Contents |
Theistic
- Main Article: Theism
Theism is the religious philosophy that asserts that God exists, that he created the world and that he continues to be involved with and intervene in the world. Theism can be divided into at least three major sects: monotheism, which holds that there is one God, polytheism is the belief in many gods, and the pantheists who view god and nature as part of the same spiritual plane and inseparable.
Creation
- Main Article: Creationism
The creation worldview (or creation point of view CPOV) is the belief that the universe, Earth, and life were deliberately created by an intelligent being. In particular, creationism is the belief that God brought the cosmos into existence from a state of non-existence. Creation in this sense is distinguished from mere change or transformation of something pre-existent (evolution).
There are two main schools of study known as religious creationism and scientific creationism, and a spectrum of beliefs on issues such as the age of the Earth, biological evolution, and the extent to which natural processes were involved with the development of the cosmos.
Biblical
- Main Articles: Christianity and Judaism
The Biblical worldview is derived from studies of the Bible which is believed to be the inspired word of God. From the earliest chapters of Genesis the Bible defines a worldview, which includes what can be called several fundamental and many derived points. Some of these are:
- A personal Creator who is distinct from the creation. In other words God is a person, not an impersonal cosmic force. God and His creation are not one and the same in essence.
- There was a historical fall in Eden, leading to everlasting death. The New Testament contains the Gospel, which describes Christ's sacrificial work that opened the only way out of this damnation.
The foundation and principles of Judaism are found in the Hebrew scriptures, more widely known as the "Old Testament", which contains the history of the early Earth and the birth and growth of the Nation of Israel. Whereas the foundation and principles of Christianity come from the New Testament of the Bible, wherein are found the doctrinal books of the Christian faith.
Islamic
- Main Article: Islam
The Islamic worldview is based on the teaching in the Qur'an. Islam is also a monotheistic religion, which agrees with the Bible on the core events of creation.
Atheistic
- Main Article: Atheism
Atheism is a philosophical denial of the existence of God.[1] A more active stance affirms the nonexistence of God, and proposes positive belief rather than mere suspension of disbelief.[2] Materialism (the disbelief in the spiritual realm), naturalism, the theory of evolution, and humanism stem inexorably from this world view.
Evolution
- Main Article: Evolutionism
The evolutionist worldview is derived from the belief that life on Earth developed from purely natural processes (evolutionism). It is a materialistic/naturalistic position that ultimately stems from atheistic philosophy. The general theory of evolution has developed across several fields of scientific study and includes the belief in biological evolution as being responsible for all life on Earth.
Evolutionism is compared by some to religious belief systems. It is argued that acceptance of the tenets of the theory of evolution requires faith because several aspects of the theory of evolution, such as the origin of life and genetic information, have not been reproduced experimentally under any conceivable circumstance. Like other religious systems, it is rooted in a philosophical position that attempts to explain the existence of the material world and life, and is embraced through a purely faith-based system.
Humanist
- Main Article: Humanism
The humanist worldview is derived from the belief that humans are but another animal having developed through materialistic evolutionary mechanisms (humanism). Humanism is also based on atheism and is founded upon a core tenet that humans are able to decide for themselves regarding what is right and wrong.
Some have argued that humanism is the world's oldest religion, ultimately beginning with the fall of man in the Garden of Eden. The book of Genesis details the temptation of Eve to eat of the forbidden tree and receive the knowledge of good and evil.[3] Following this simple act, humankind began to view itself as an autonomous, self-directed, god-like person.[4] A person upholds humanism whenever they place their own views or opinions above the Word of God. Currently, humanism is the only religious worldview allowed in the U.S. public school system where it permeates every facet of curricula. Whether discussing world history or some field of science, Biblical truths are nowhere to be found in modern schools. In contrast, the humanistic concepts of morality, naturalism, and the theory of evolution are treated as dogma.
Conflicts
The creation vs. evolution debate highlights the two basic worldviews or belief systems: one in which God is at the center of the picture, and one that places man at the center. Evolution, by its very nature, requires a worldview in opposition to the Bible. Simply put, if evolution is true, then the Bible is incorrect. If Genesis isn’t true, it casts doubt on the accuracy of the whole Bible.
- Adam and Eve were only mythological; they didn’t disobey God and introduce sin into the world;
- Sin is then just undesirable traits left over from the lower stages of evolution, which humankind will eventually outgrow;
- Jesus is merely a good man, perhaps ahead of his time, rather than the Savior and cornerstone of our faith.
The Biblical worldview holds that man is a fallen creature—essentially flawed, selfish, and in need of a Savior. Without God prominently in the picture, culture and society inevitably degenerate to a state of disorder and decay (de-evolution). The humanist view on the other hand, is that man’s nature is essentially good, and that if given enough time we will eventually outgrow the problems that society faces. This view states that we need to throw off past restraints (especially religious and moral restraints) so that we are free to explore and develop toward a higher state of being.
These two views are the basis of today’s culture clash. Generally on the liberal / humanist / evolutionist side are the news and entertainment media, government schools and universities, government institutions, and other liberal groups. On the Biblical side are the evangelical and fundamentalist churches, and conservative, pro-family groups. The clash is becoming more vocal as liberal groups demand ever more freedom from traditional moral values. Evolution is the rallying point of humanist groups. If, as they claim, we’re just accidents in space, then we can set the rules and don’t have to be accountable to any God.
Culture War
These two trends of thought may be plainly seen in our society today, resulting in a war between the two cultures when they clash. The liberal viewpoint has successfully challenged the accepted standards of behavior in virtually every aspect of life today. One of the ways the humanist viewpoint has made itself manifest in today’s culture is the concept of moral relativism or relative morality. This is the notion that there are no absolute standards of behavior, because what’s wrong for you may be perfectly normal for someone else. Moral relativism says that it’s okay to do anything you want as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone.
The fact that there is a battle at all is only because traditional values groups are fighting to hold on to a vanishing concept of morality in public life.
Code Words
Christians are routinely accused of seeing things in black and white because we subscribe to rules given to us by the Lawgiver, which clearly define standards of right and wrong. In contradistinction to those laws, some trendy terms have been adopted by liberals and subsequently become associated with modern pop culture. Here are some of the most prominent:
- Tolerance = don’t judge anyone’s moral behavior, no matter what it is, because there are no absolute standards of behavior. Christians are viewed as intolerant because we believe that God has given us certain laws, which if not followed will lead to moral chaos and decay of society.
- Diversity = the fact that there’s biological diversity in God’s creation is extended to mean that every type of belief and morality is equally valid; we need to have every type of aberrant behavior or special interest group equally represented to avoid any hint of discrimination.
- Multiculturalism = all cultures and religions are equally valid; no one of these is better than any other; therefore there is no such thing as absolute truth, but all beliefs are subjective.
These terms are so widely used in the popular culture that, along with evolution, they’ve become accepted as absolute truth, not to be questioned. If anyone dares to challenge their validity they’re labeled as intolerant bigots.
Evolution: Existence of Life through Death and Struggle
Evolutionism says that through constant struggle, the fittest survive. The best are selected out to reproduce, and through this process beneficial traits accumulate to propel us to higher stages on the evolutionary ladder. Though not often stated, the goal of the evolutionary process is envisioned as a humanistic utopia, in which war, disease and poverty are vanquished.
Creation: Death Is a Result of Man’s Actions
The Bible teaches that because of our fallen nature we are separated from God. Our tendency to want to question what God has said started in the Garden of Eden, and has carried over to modern culture. Instead of trusting God, humanity would rather have our own way, and find out what evil is all about by experiencing it.
but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die. Genesis 2:17
He [the serpent] said to the woman, "Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?" Genesis 3:1b
"You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." Genesis 3:4-5
They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a powerful delusion so that they will believe the lie 2Thessalonians 2:10b-11
This lie alluded to is essentially the effect of lifting man above that of God. It is the expression of life that means we don’t want God to interfere. This is manifest in statements such as this one by Harvard geneticist and Marxist Richard Lewontin:
| “ | We [scientists] have … a prior commitment to materialism [and] we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations… Moreover, that materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door. - Lewontin, R., "Billions and Billions of Demons," The New York Review, Jan. 9, 1997, p. 31 | ” |
Science Redefined
With the acceptance of Darwinism by the mainstream scientific community, the quest for an explanation of our world has been redefined in terms of materialism and naturalism.
| “ | If there is no God, then everything is permissible. —Fyodor Dostoyevski | ” |
| “ | [I suppose the reason] we all jumped at the Origin [of Species] was because the idea of God interfered with our sexual mores. —Sir Julian Huxley, evolutionary biologist, 1887-1975 | ” |
This is in stark contrast to Biblical Christianity from what it states in Romans 1:22-25 . Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles. Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator--who is forever praised.
Interpretive framework
An interpretive framework is a set of unscientific assumptions used to interpret the factual observations in order to gain an overall greater understanding of a particular object, event, or concept. It is inherent that evolutionists and creationists equally rely on philosophical assumptions regarding origin of life issues when observing the diversity of life.
An interpretive framework is an essential element for human reasoning of factual observations. However the separation of philosophical and scientific has become blurred by a total acceptance of the unobserved change of molecules-to-man evolution. Science should not present these philosophical assumptions within their findings, but the essential nature of interpretive frameworks is that without them, the ability to interpret reality to a fuller extent is limited. Evolutionists appeal to a naturalistic philosophy while creationists rely upon supernaturalism. Neither philosophical interpretive framework is wrong, because both are unobserved and thus unscientific, however modern science presents one above another to form a bias. To let people refine their own interpretive frameworks, or philosophies of science, by having a source lacking in philosophy but consisting of observable, repeatable, unbiased, objective and reliable data should be the purpose of science.
Examples of interpretive frameworks include:
- Language: the ability of the mind to draw meaning from sounds or visual signals;
- Sight: the ability of the mind to draw conclusions about one's physical environment from visual stimuli
- Philosophy: the ability to process, categorize, and analyze complex concepts.
Science vs. Religion
In the popular media the clash between worldviews, as embodied in the creation – evolution debate, has been characterized by portraying science as hard, objective facts, while religion, Biblical Christianity in particular, is just subjective, unprovable feelings. Religion teaches morality but otherwise has no relation to the real world.
Evolution is a Religion
We see that evolution is a worldview—a philosophy, a belief system better described as evolutionism. As mentioned earlier, secular humanism, which has been defined as a religion, has evolution as its foundation.
Some people defend evolution to the end, not because of its scientific merits, but because it’s their philosophical base: if they were to admit it’s wrong it would destroy their whole belief system. Changing one’s philosophical base involves a huge paradigm shift, which, without God’s help is well nigh impossible.
Proverbs 14:12 There is a way that seems right to a man, but in the end it leads to death.
| “ | Evolution is not merely a biological theory of little significance. It is a world view—the world view diametrically opposing the Christian world view. Therefore Christians ignore it or compromise with it at great peril! —Dr. Henry Morris, The Long War Against God, Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, MI, 1989, p. 23 | ” |
References
- ↑ "Atheism and Agnosticism." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, March 9, 2004. Accessed October 12, 2008.
- ↑ Sarfati, Jonathan. "Atheism is more rational?" (Dialogue) Creation Ministries International, September 5, 2000. Accessed October 12, 2008.
- ↑ LaHaye, T., Noebel, D. Mind Siege. Nashville: Word Publishing. 2000. p. 69
- ↑ LaHaye, p. 79
| |||||||||||||||||
